De minimis Is Back on the Court Calendar
Four items need follow-up today. They belong in different files: an Italian pasta antidumping case, a de minimis / IEEPA scheduling dispute, an FTZ grantee change in Ohio, and several defense-trade notices.
DOJ asked the Court of International Trade to consolidate two Garofalo pasta cases tied to Commerce's 2023-2024 antidumping review of pasta from Italy. Detroit Axle opposed a motion to reschedule oral argument in its challenge to the de minimis exemption change under IEEPA. The Foreign-Trade Zones Board named the Development Finance Authority of Summit County as the new grantee for FTZ 181 in the Akron/Canton area. DSCA also published arms-sale notifications that identify the purchaser, articles, value, and congressional-report date for each transaction.
The Garofalo filing is a calendar and case-management item. Track the consolidated docket before changing the litigation plan.
Detroit Axle is about timing. The next useful signal is the oral-argument schedule, because that controls when the court hears the de minimis / IEEPA merits.
FTZ 181 is operational. A grantee change can leave the legal zone intact while still changing contacts, documentation channels, or activation workflow.
The DSCA notices are routine in form but concrete in content. Screen only where the purchaser, article, end-use, or re-export path touches an active file.
For Italian pasta AD exposure, update the litigation calendar and watch for the case-management schedule.
For de minimis programs, keep the Detroit Axle date on the legal-risk calendar. Do not treat current landed-cost assumptions as settled until the court rules.
For FTZ 181, confirm operator agreements, admission procedures, inventory-control points, and CBP-facing documentation contacts with the new grantee.
For defense trade, screen the Canada, UAE, Qatar, and other purchaser-specific notices by purchaser, article, value, and end-use profile. The AECA section 36(b) review period runs from the report-delivery date to Congress, not the Federal Register publication date.
CIT: the Garofalo consolidated docket and case-management schedule.
CIT: the Detroit Axle oral-argument scheduling order.
FTZ: any grantee guidance on contacts, admission procedures, or interim documentation.
Defense trade: the AECA review periods listed in the DSCA notices, especially when a transaction creates end-use or re-export licensing work.
Do the desk checks separately: litigation calendar, de minimis exposure, FTZ operating contacts, and defense-trade screening.
Garofalo Pasta Antidumping Consolidation Motion
DOJ filed a consent motion to consolidate CIT case 26-02704 with lead case 26-02686, both involving Pastificio Lucio Garofalo S.p.A. of Italy, challenging Commerce's final results in the 2023-2024 antidumping duty administrative review of certain pasta from Italy (A-475-818; Garofalo final margin 7.00%).
The immediate task is calendar coordination and case management. AD counsel should track the consolidated docket for the schedule and any later orders before changing briefing assumptions.
Court of International Trade / antidumping duty administrative review challenge / Italy and United States / pasta (A-475-818).
Detroit Axle De Minimis / IEEPA Oral-Argument Scheduling Dispute
Axle of Dearborn, Inc. (d/b/a Detroit Axle) filed opposition to a motion to reschedule oral argument in CIT Case No. 1:25-cv-00091, its challenge to the elimination of the de minimis exemption under IEEPA, brought against the Departments of Commerce, Homeland Security, the Treasury, and CBP.
This is a de minimis / IEEPA case, not a Section 232 matter. The scheduling order affects when the court hears the merits. Importers using de minimis entry should keep the date on the legal-risk calendar.
Paid review
Paid keeps the archive and source-backed exports available when a review needs to stay open.
See Paid pricing