USMCA Remains in Force as Annual Review Track Opens
Do not update entry treatment from a press line, price accord, or partner arrangement alone. Identify the operative file first: Article 34.6 notice or Article 34.7 review posture for USMCA, Commerce and USITC records for tomatoes, and the specific Section 232 implementation rule for each auto entry.
Today's analyses split public posture from entry treatment. The USMCA joint review did not start Article 34.6 withdrawal, Mexico's tomato price file does not displace the U.S. AD order, and EU, Japan, and UK auto arrangements do not pull USMCA origin rules into those partner entries.
USTR's July 1 statement says the United States did not agree to renew USMCA in its current form and that the agreement remains in force. That does not start the Article 34.6 six-month withdrawal clock. It does put Article 34.7's annual-review track in play, with the 2036 sunset still unextended. Current USMCA preference claims still depend on the existing origin rules, certifications, and records.
Read the full analysis: USMCA Review Did Not Start the Withdrawal Clock.
Mexico's minimum-export-price accord may matter as record evidence in a later Commerce review, but it does not suspend the U.S. antidumping order. After the USITC's June 30 changed-circumstances determination, the order remains in force. Covered fresh tomato entries from Mexico remain governed by Commerce's suspension of liquidation and cash-deposit instructions.
Read the full analysis: Mexico's Tomato Accord Sets Up the Next AD Review.