1
CIT Lifts Stay, Orders CBP to Show Cause on IEEPA Reliquidation Compliance
In Vos Selections Inc. v. United States, the U.S. Court of International Trade sua sponte lifted a stay and ordered CBP to show cause why the suspension of its order — requiring CBP to liquidate or reliquidate all entries subject to IEEPA duties without applying those duties — should not be removed. A hearing is set for June 9, 2026.
This is a compliance order inside the IEEPA refund phase. After the Supreme Court held on February 20, 2026 that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, the live question is reliquidation and refund of duties already paid, not collection going forward. The order presses CBP to move suspended entries off the list and reliquidate them without the IEEPA duty; June 9 is the deadline for CBP to defend its timeline.
Judicial / U.S. Court of International Trade / IEEPA (post-Supreme Court, held invalid Feb. 20, 2026) / Case Vos Selections Inc. v. United States / Suspended entries pending reliquidation
Source · May 28, 2026 · ↗
2
CIT: Houston Shutters LLC Files Rule 56.1 Motion Challenging Agency Trade Record
Houston Shutters LLC filed a motion for judgment on the agency record (Rule 56.1) at the U.S. Court of International Trade in Case 1:24-cv-00193, with the government response due by July 2, 2026.
This is a summary-judgment challenge to an underlying agency determination in an AD/CVD or related trade case. The July 2 response deadline may signal a CIT decision in July or August. If a client faces the same product and country scope, the outcome may affect that client's litigation or duty-rate assumptions.
Judicial / U.S. Court of International Trade / AD/CVD / Case 1:24-cv-00193 / Agency record challenge
Source · May 29, 2026 · ↗
3
USITC Inv. 337-TA-1483: UHN Added as Co-Complainant in Medical Imaging Devices Case
The USITC declined to review an ALJ order granting an unopposed motion to add University Health Network (UHN) as a co-complainant in Section 337 investigation 337-TA-1483 on certain medical imaging devices.
The co-complainant addition expands the party roster but does not change the investigation's scope, remedy, or timeline. It may signal broader industry alignment on the device definition and could indicate the scope will be tested more rigorously during substantive phases.
Executive / USITC / Section 337 / Investigation 337-TA-1483 / Medical imaging devices / United States and Canada
Source · May 28, 2026 · ↗
4
USITC Institutes Monitoring Investigation on Fine Denier PSF Safeguard (TA-201-78)
The USITC instituted investigation TA-201-78 to monitor domestic industry developments following the safeguard measure on fine denier polyester staple fiber imposed under Proclamation 10857 (November 8, 2024), and will prepare a Section 204(a)(2) report to the President and Congress on the industry's adjustment progress.
This monitoring docket opens a new reporting cycle on safeguard effectiveness. The Section 204(a)(2) report will inform the President's decision on whether to maintain, modify, or terminate the safeguard. If you source or sell fine denier PSF, this docket will determine whether the safeguard rate or scope changes.
Executive / USITC / Section 201 safeguard / Section 204 monitoring / Investigation TA-201-78 / Fine denier polyester staple fiber / Proclamation 10857
Source · May 28, 2026 · ↗
5
CIT Case 1:26-cv-00788, Chae Opposes Govt Extension to File Dismissal Reply Brief
Plaintiff Byungmin Chae filed a pro se opposition to the U.S. government's motion to extend its deadline to reply in support of a motion to dismiss in CIT Case 1:26-cv-00788-TMR before Judge Timothy M. Reif.
This is a routine procedural dispute on a dismissal motion. The opposition signals an active contested matter, but the outcome will depend on the underlying claims and the judge's ruling on the extension request. No substantive trade-policy signal is present.
Judicial / U.S. Court of International Trade / Case 1:26-cv-00788-TMR / Procedural motion / Judge Timothy M. Reif
Source · May 28, 2026 · ↗