The USITC declined to review an ALJ order amending the complaint in Investigation 337-TA-1415 to correct respondent name from 'Vivace, Inc. d/b/a Dae Do Inc.' to 'Dae Do Inc. d/b/a Vivace.' The procedural correction leaves the substance of the Section 337 investigation into certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair unchanged.

Follow this source

Get Daily Trade Signals when this scope starts moving.

Subscription scopeDaily Trade SignalsThe daily email, with this source context saved for matching.Only Section 337Filter future fragments toward this policy instrument.This HS code or caseFollow changes linked to HS 67.

Subscribes you to Daily Trade Signals and stores this source page, selected scope, and a timestamp for alert matching. Unsubscribe anytime. See our privacy policy.

Review Snapshot

Scope: HS 67 / Section 337
Question: Does this source change alter exposure, timing, or review priority for HS 67 / Section 337?
Next move: Check HS 67 in Tariffs, then save the scope if this question repeats.

From source to scope

Run HS 67 through Scope Check before saving recurring review work.

Check this source against a scope

Legal / Policy Context

Policy instruments

Section 337

Practical Takeaways

Check the tagged HS codes in tariff context before treating this as a general market signal.
Use Paths to see adjacent source records, countries, and instruments before escalating this as a standalone change.

Source Trail

USITCPrimary briefing source

Open source