CBP has expanded CAPE Phase 3 access, but its program-wide totals cannot show how quickly newly admitted entries move toward an IEEPA tariff refund.
Primary lensEntry posture review
Sub-topicCAPE processing
Evidence base3 records used
Use caseRefund posture
CBP has accepted nearly 15.84 million entries into CAPE Phase 3, but its latest figures do not show how quickly those entries reach a refund. Access is expanding to additional plaintiffs while most processing and dollar totals still cover the entire CAPE program. For a customs manager reviewing outstanding claims, the date and processing stage of each entry are essential to interpreting that progress.
CBP's October 26 court declaration makes that distinction immediate. Plaintiffs that submitted a valid importer of record number before August 14 can now file Phase 3 declarations. At launch, the admitted group consisted of plaintiffs that had supplied valid numbers by July 30. CBP will notify additional plaintiffs through their counsel as access opens. The declaration supplies no timetable for the next group or promised payment interval.
The useful comparison is among entries that reached the same processing stage at a comparable time. CBP's new figures establish substantial activity without providing that comparison.
Two acceptance figures measure different things
As of October 23, CAPE declarations that passed file validation covered 44 million entries. That is an initial screening measure. The declaration's footnote expressly says that further processing depends on entry-specific validation. Passing the file check does not establish that every entry listed in the file has passed the next check.
Phase 3's figure is narrower. CBP reported 3,960 declarations covering 15,834,190 entries that had passed both file and entry validation. Those entries concern finally liquidated plaintiff entries for which the court has ordered reliquidation, including entries subject to protest. CBP, October 26 declaration, paragraphs 3-4, footnote 2 and paragraph 8
That distinction rules out a tempting shortcut. Dividing 15.83 million by 44 million would not yield Phase 3's share of all entries that have cleared both checks. The denominator includes entries whose further acceptance remains conditional. A report headed simply “accepted entries” would conceal the difference.
Failures also need their own descriptions. CBP lists file problems such as importer or filer mismatches, invalid entry numbers and CSV formatting. Its separate entry-validation figures include duplicate submissions and entries without an IEEPA Chapter 99 provision, alongside entries beyond its 90-day voluntary reliquidation authority. The October filing does not break those failures down by phase. It cannot support a Phase 3 rejection rate or a conclusion that every unsuccessful file represents an ineligible claim.
The October increase crosses a launch date
The previous declaration's program-wide snapshot was October 2. Phase 3 opened on October 6. The new October 23 snapshot therefore covers a program whose available processing routes changed between observations.
Reported measure
October 2
October 23
What the figure establishes
Entries on declarations passing file validation
27.4 million
44 million
File screening, subject to entry-specific validation
Accepted entries liquidated and/or reliquidated without IEEPA duties
21.19 million
36.32 million
Entry adjustment across CAPE
Potential and certified refunds accepted for processing
$136.6 billion
$137.9 billion
Combined amounts at different refund stages
Refunds certified and sent to Treasury, duties plus interest
File-screened entries increased by 16.6 million, while entries liquidated or reliquidated increased by 15.13 million. Neither increase is identified as Phase 3 alone. The filings provide no phase-level allocation of completed adjustments or dollar amounts, and no entry-level connection between the two reporting dates. Matching either increase to the 15.83 million Phase 3 entries would assign a cause that CBP has not supplied.
Dollar totals rose much less in percentage terms than entry counts. The declarations do not link those dollar changes to the newly accepted Phase 3 entries or identify their refund stages. Dividing the change in dollars by the change in entries would mix different measures and produce no reliable average Phase 3 refund.
Access and processing have different start dates
Phase 3 does have a direct earlier observation. By noon on launch day, 477 declarations covering 425,517 entries had passed both checks. That is comparable in definition to the October 23 Phase 3 acceptance count. It demonstrates a large expansion in accepted volume. It supplies neither the number of Phase 3 entries subsequently reliquidated nor their elapsed processing time. CBP, October 6 declaration, paragraph 8
Rolling access adds another problem to any elapsed-time comparison. An importer newly notified in October could not necessarily submit at launch. Counting all outstanding entries from October 6 would attribute time awaiting access to the processing of a declaration that had not yet been filed.
Traverse's earlier analysis of the IOR submission cutoff addressed which plaintiffs could enter the system. The reporting question now is what happened after each importer received access. Preserve that notice date alongside the actual submission date and the results of both validations. The dates answer different questions and should survive any monthly summary.
Escalate the unresolved stage
A practical Phase 3 report should group entries by access notice and submission period, then show their latest evidenced stage. Within each group, retain entries awaiting validation, entries with a stated failure, and entries that passed validation but lack a later adjustment record. Attach the observed reason or missing record to the entry number, with the date checked. Preserve earlier observations so the reviewer can distinguish an unchanged status from a gap in the records available to the team. These are proposed internal controls, not additional CBP filing requirements.
That structure makes the handoff specific. Counsel can examine an unresolved access or court-order issue. The filer can investigate a documented file or entry-validation failure. For an accepted entry, the team can seek the next recorded processing event without treating a newly admitted batch as evidence of a system-wide delay. The declaration establishes no service standard against which to call an entry overdue.
A future CBP report could supply a Phase 3 benchmark by separating validation, reliquidation and refund outcomes by admission or submission period. For now, send the reviewer the last recorded stage, the dates checked and the specific missing result. Revise the report when a validation response, liquidation record or refund status supplies that result.
Daily Trade Brief
Get the next one in your inbox.
New U.S. trade actions and the analysis that changes an import, customs, or counsel file, on weekday mornings after you confirm your address.
From reading to review
Run the numbers on your lane.
The duty calculator runs the current stack for any HTS code and origin. A free account opens full tool output, AD/CVD detail, Chapter 98 processing, and available exports.