Loading
ReadUpdated Jul 4, 2026
Analysis
Source-backed trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then move from public record to operating posture.
Published pieces71 in the archive
Current leadOrigin decision support
Evidence standardCitable public records
Primary useImport-team framing
Browse
Topics
Origin review11 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Entry posture review18 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Trade policy4 piecesPolicy monitoringMetals scope review3 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Trade remedies3 piecesAD/CVD ordersPhosphate CVD ordersExport controls5 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+1Tariff authority20 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Customs enforcement3 piecesUFLPA enforcementDe minimis administrationTrade governance3 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1
Filtered
Tariff authority stream
The DST Tariff Threat Splits Rate From Speed
A 100 percent DST tariff threat points to Section 301, but collection still needs a USTR instrument, product scope, effective date, and HTS language.
USTR's Forced-Labor 301 Turns on the Test It Made for Itself
USTR's forced-labor Section 301 case is strongest on authority and weakest on method, and Switzerland is the cleanest case showing why.
Turnberry Is Now Harder Law in Brussels Than in Washington
The EU has legislated its Turnberry concessions into binding Union law, while the U.S. ceiling now rests on a contested, expiring Section 122 bridge under appeal.
