Loading
ReadUpdated Oct 2, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces336 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy105 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies15 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Export controls19 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Tariff authority72 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Customs enforcement33 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Metals scope review10 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Origin review30 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Trade governance10 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Entry posture review39 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Filtered
Tariff authority stream
Korea Section 301 Has One Tariff, One Investigation, and an Unresolved Coupang File
Senator Moreno's new letter raises pressure but does not open a trade case or add a duty. The overlooked problem is the petitioners' withdrawal announcement alongside USTR's unchanged petition page.
Section 301 Forced-Labor Tariff Lawsuit Tests USTR's 10% and 12.5% Rates
The August 24 Learning Resources motion in the Section 301 forced-labor tariff lawsuit puts USTR's 10 percent and 12.5 percent rates under a separate appropriateness test. An import compliance manager should keep current duty treatment as the model's base case while tracking the rate evidence the government cites on September 4.
