Loading
ReadUpdated Aug 18, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces210 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy40 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies10 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Customs enforcement20 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Tariff authority58 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Entry posture review29 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Export controls12 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Trade governance8 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Origin review24 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Metals scope review6 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Filtered
Tariff authority stream
Any Section 301 Excess-Capacity Tariff Needs a Stacking Rule
A future excess-capacity action could overlap the new forced-labor duty, while tariff note 52 points to cumulative collection for another Chapter 99 duty. The new action still must define how two Section 301 headings interact.
EU DMA Section 301 Tariff Threat Exposes Turnberry’s 15 Percent Split
Turnberry’s U.S. and EU texts define the 15 percent tariff framework differently, leaving any future digital Section 301 duty without one shared cap rule.
