Loading
ReadUpdated Oct 2, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces336 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy105 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies15 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Export controls19 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Tariff authority72 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Customs enforcement33 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Metals scope review10 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Origin review30 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Trade governance10 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Entry posture review39 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Filtered
Forced-labor action stream
CIT Forced-Labor Tariff Cases Still Have Motions, Not Orders
The parties proposed 26-03345 as a master case and asked to finish merits briefing by September 29. At the verified cutoff, the public docket showed motions and unsigned proposed orders, not operative deadlines.
Forced Labor Section 301 Drawback Depends on Existing Customs Rules
Forced labor Section 301 drawback remains governed by standing customs law because the final action creates no special recovery rule. Importers need a traceable chain from the paid duty line to a qualifying export or destruction before filing.
