Loading
ReadUpdated Aug 18, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces210 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy40 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies10 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Customs enforcement20 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Tariff authority58 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Entry posture review29 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Export controls12 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Trade governance8 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Origin review24 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Metals scope review6 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Filtered
Forced-labor action stream
India's Trade Deal Can Shift Its Proposed Section 301 Rate
India is in USTR's proposed 12.5 percent forced labor tier, but a qualifying trade agreement commitment could support a 10 percent rate. That missing import prohibition term is a concrete test of New Delhi's demand for comparative advantage, while separate Section 301 exposure remains.
USTR's Section 301 Forced-Labor Proposal Lacks a Country-Review Process
USTR's Section 301 forced-labor proposal sets a starting tariff rate for each covered economy but leaves no published process for reassessment after reform. Entry treatment changes only when USTR issues operative terms with an effective date.
