Loading
ReadUpdated Aug 18, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces210 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy40 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies10 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Customs enforcement20 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Tariff authority58 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Entry posture review29 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Export controls12 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Trade governance8 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Origin review24 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Metals scope review6 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Filtered
Section 122 surcharge stream
Section 122 Tariff Appeal: DOJ's Two Paths Past the CIT
DOJ's Federal Circuit brief presses two ways past the CIT: a broad Section 122 reading or a narrower basic-balance application. A remand could erase the judgment without settling either theory, while preserved issues may still keep the litigation alive.
Section 122 Tariff Expiration Does Not Reset Your Customs Bond
Section 122 ends prospective assessments after the July 24 cutoff, but qualifying duties can remain in the preceding 12-month data used for CBP's bond review. Importers should model the runout before requesting a replacement bond.
