Loading
ReadUpdated Oct 2, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces336 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy105 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies15 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Export controls19 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Tariff authority72 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Customs enforcement33 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Metals scope review10 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Origin review30 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Trade governance10 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Entry posture review39 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Latest
Recent analysis stream
Washington's CSDDD Requests Run Through Three EU Forums
CSDDD guidance can shape risk reviews and verifier standards, but it cannot exempt U.S. companies or condition national damages claims on a supervisory finding. The requested relief depends on Commission guidance, EU legislation, and Member State transposition.
Is the Strait of Hormuz Open? Four Tests Before a Restart
JMIC described neutral transit as permitted on August 16, but severe risk and unreliable AIS leave normal service unproven. Import teams need four records.
DOJ Ties Transnational Subsidy Authority to Section 303's Repeal
DOJ's August 13 brief treats Congress's omission and later repeal of Section 303's same-country phrase as evidence that Section 701 reaches cross-border subsidies. The CIT can accept that history yet still narrow the rule through the singular-country, consortium, or specificity provisions.
