Loading
ReadUpdated Oct 2, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces336 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy105 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies15 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Export controls19 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Tariff authority72 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Customs enforcement33 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Metals scope review10 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Origin review30 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Trade governance10 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Entry posture review39 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Latest
Recent analysis stream
A Credible Section 301 Excess Capacity Record Starts by Sector
USTR used trade surpluses and other indicators to select 16 economies for review. As of July 17, no final excess-capacity action had been issued. The next tariff signal is whether the agency's findings connect a government practice and sector evidence to a burden on U.S. commerce.
CIT Order Sets a Day-80 Gate for CAPE Phase 3 Plaintiff Refunds
A July 15 CIT order sets the day-80 gate for covered plaintiffs' entries in planned CAPE Phase 3 and requires counsel to give CBP the matching IOR IDs. The result is a rolling process that begins before statutory finality and can continue after day 90.
