Loading
ReadUpdated Jul 4, 2026
Analysis
Source-backed trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then move from public record to operating posture.
Published pieces71 in the archive
Current leadOrigin decision support
Evidence standardCitable public records
Primary useImport-team framing
Browse
Topics
Origin review11 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Entry posture review18 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Trade policy4 piecesPolicy monitoringMetals scope review3 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Trade remedies3 piecesAD/CVD ordersPhosphate CVD ordersExport controls5 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+1Tariff authority20 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Customs enforcement3 piecesUFLPA enforcementDe minimis administrationTrade governance3 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1
Latest
Recent analysis stream
WTO Reform Leaves Tariff Refunds in U.S. Court
WTO reform affects dispute risk rather than CBP refunds. Importers still preserve recovery through liquidation status, protest deadlines, and U.S. litigation.
Finally-Liquidated Entries Become the IEEPA Chokepoint
IEEPA refund recovery now turns on entry posture. Finally-liquidated entries need a valid reopening event before CBP can determine and pay the refund.
The Nearshoring Trap in Foreign Investment Screening
A pending House bill would make U.S. FTA partners eligible for screening assistance, turning nearshore ownership diligence into supply continuity risk.
