Loading
ReadUpdated Jul 4, 2026
Analysis
Source-backed trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then move from public record to operating posture.
Published pieces71 in the archive
Current leadOrigin decision support
Evidence standardCitable public records
Primary useImport-team framing
Browse
Topics
Origin review11 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Entry posture review18 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Trade policy4 piecesPolicy monitoringMetals scope review3 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Trade remedies3 piecesAD/CVD ordersPhosphate CVD ordersExport controls5 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+1Tariff authority20 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Customs enforcement3 piecesUFLPA enforcementDe minimis administrationTrade governance3 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1
Latest
Recent analysis stream
Turnberry Is Now Harder Law in Brussels Than in Washington
The EU has legislated its Turnberry concessions into binding Union law, while the U.S. ceiling now rests on a contested, expiring Section 122 bridge under appeal.
A 301-on-232 Steel Stack Would Shift the Refund Fight Back to the Entry Line
A Section 301 overcapacity remedy stacked on Section 232 steel would lack the IEEPA-style systemwide refund predicate and push recovery back to the entry line.
Detroit Axle's Roadmap: The De Minimis Case Is Becoming the Post-IEEPA Tariff Playbook
Detroit Axle's de minimis case surfaces a two-part logic that, if the CIT panel adopts it, could become a template for IEEPA actions after Learning Resources.
