Loading
ReadUpdated Aug 18, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces210 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy40 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies10 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Customs enforcement20 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Tariff authority58 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Entry posture review29 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Export controls12 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Trade governance8 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Origin review24 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Metals scope review6 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Latest
Recent analysis stream
WTO Special and Differential Treatment Reform Needs a Provision-Level Evidence Rule
Members are considering how to review the use and effectiveness of WTO special and differential treatment provisions beyond an implementation inventory. They have not agreed who supplies each field on utilization and outcomes, who may assess it, or which WTO body owns the next step.
A Three-Judge CIT Panel Does Not Bypass the Federal Circuit
The CIT's Section 301 panels reflect Section 255 findings. Appeals still run through the Federal Circuit, and current tariff obligations do not change.
