Loading
ReadUpdated Aug 18, 2026
Analysis
Trade-policy analysis for import-scope decisions, written from the public record. Start from a product line, origin, supplier, or case, then read what the record changes for that file.
Published pieces210 in the archive
Current leadPolicy monitoring
SourcingCitable public records
Written forImport and customs teams
Browse
Topics
Trade policy40 piecesPolicy monitoringTrade remedies10 piecesAD/CVD ordersInjury determination+1Customs enforcement20 piecesClassification and valuationUFLPA enforcement+2Tariff authority58 piecesSection 301 trackSection 122 surcharge+2Entry posture review29 piecesRefund postureCAPE processing+3Export controls12 piecesLicensing regimeFDPR enforcement+2Trade governance8 piecesAdvisory committeeEXIM reauthorization+1Origin review24 piecesUSMCA reviewAuto rules of origin+1Metals scope review6 piecesSection 232 metalsSection 232 copper+1Tariff relief2 piecesExclusion process
Latest
Recent analysis stream
Forced Labor Section 301 Drawback Depends on Existing Customs Rules
Forced labor Section 301 drawback remains governed by standing customs law because the final action creates no special recovery rule. Importers need a traceable chain from the paid duty line to a qualifying export or destruction before filing.
Tariff Impact on Prices: What Importers Can Prove From Their Records
Chair Kevin Warsh listed tariffs among recent shocks as he described an FOMC discussion of whether price increases could become broader inflation. Importers can test direct pass-through by linking the tariff amount on an entry to its inventory cohort, later SKU price, and a non-tariff comparison.
