Solar AD/CVD Totals Can Misstate the Cash Due at Entry
Solar AD/CVD forecasts for India, Indonesia and Laos must separate announced rates from deposits collected during the current countervailing duty pause.
Primary lensTrade remedies
Sub-topicAD/CVD orders
Evidence base8 records used
Use caseTrade-remedy exposure
Commerce's final solar determinations give importers rates to budget for, but applying those rates to a September shipment can produce the wrong cash requirement. For India, the department announced a 123.04 percent dumping margin, a subsidy-adjusted antidumping cash-deposit rate of 107.17 percent and a countervailing duty rate of 126.09 percent. Those are three different inputs. The September 11 final determinations do not make all three collectible at once.
The latest public CBP instruction available on September 14 requires a 123.04 percent AD deposit on covered Indian entries during a pause in CVD provisional measures. If both announced final deposit components later apply, their sum would be 233.26 percent. Adding the unadjusted dumping margin to CVD instead produces 249.13 percent. An import compliance manager needs to keep the current payment and the conditional future payment separate in the shipment's cash forecast. explains why.
The distinction extends beyond India. CVD provisional measures for Indonesia and Laos are also suspended for entries from June 26. The USITC has scheduled its final injury vote for October 14. Its outcome, publication and subsequent implementing instructions will determine how the next stage operates. None of these calculations covers every tariff or fee on a shipment, and each assumes that the cells or modules fall within the investigation's scope.
The CVD pause restores India's full AD deposit
The summer interruption comes from the statutory limit on CVD provisional measures. In message 6181401, Commerce instructed CBP to discontinue CVD suspension of liquidation on Indian solar entries from June 26, the day after the 120-day period ended. Suspension is the hold that prevents Customs from finalizing an entry's duty assessment. The instruction leaves the companion AD requirement in place.
That last provision changes the arithmetic. India's preliminary AD deposit had included subsidy offsets. When CVD provisional measures expired, Commerce directed CBP to collect the full 123.04 percent AD rate, effective June 26. The August 17 instruction covers the named producers and exporters and the all-others category. It expressly connects the higher AD deposit to the end of CVD provisional measures. Traverse's record of the Indian preliminary AD determination provides the earlier procedural context.
The Indonesian discontinuation instruction and Laotian instruction use the same June 26 cutoff. Each says CVD suspension will resume only after an affirmative final ITC determination is published in the Federal Register. Commerce's September announcement therefore supplies a future planning input without ending the CVD pause.
A supplier comparison needs the adjusted component
For a hypothetical Indian shipment with a $1 million entered value, the current 123.04 percent AD instruction implies $1,230,400 in AD deposits. A future scenario using the announced 107.17 percent AD deposit plus 126.09 percent CVD would require $2,332,600. That is an additional $1,102,200 of entry financing, assuming unchanged value and that both components become applicable. It is not a forecast of final assessed liability.
Using the unadjusted margin in that future scenario would overstate the two-component deposit by $158,700. Yet using only the current deposit throughout a delivery contract would miss the much larger potential increase when CVD collection resumes. A forecast can make either mistake depending on which date its rate column silently assumes.
The table reconstructs the announced final-rate combinations from Commerce's September 11 tables. It is a planning comparison for subject merchandise, conditional on both components applying to the matched supplier. These are not current collection instructions. Rates are percentages of entered value and exclude other duties and fees.
Supplier category in the final announcement
AD component used
CVD component
Conditional combined amount
India, named firms and all others
107.17%
126.09%
233.26%
Indonesia, PT REC Solar Energy and all others
94.36%
73.20%
167.56%
Indonesia, PT Blue Sky Solar
94.36%
173.70%
268.06%
Laos, Solarspace and CVD all others
65.03%
82.03%
147.06%
Laos, Vietnam Sunergy CVD category
65.03%
153.67%
218.70%
Commerce lists subsidy-adjusted AD deposits for India and Laos. Its Indonesia table lists a dumping margin without a separate adjusted-deposit column, so the Indonesian sums above remain provisional calculations pending the operative instructions. The Laos AD table also distinguishes exporters and producers. A supplier's commercial name alone is insufficient to establish which combination governs an entry.
October 14 is a vote date, not a collection date
The USITC calendar schedules the vote for October 14 at 11 a.m. The CVD discontinuation messages identify Federal Register publication of an affirmative ITC finding as the event that ends the pause. Tie the future rate in the cash forecast to that publication condition instead of automatically switching on the scheduled vote date.
An affirmative Commerce determination also leaves the injury question open. Commerce's explanation of final determinations says an affirmative ITC result leads to orders, while a negative result terminates the investigation. The vote outcome must therefore remain a scenario assumption until decided.
Earlier entries need separate treatment. The discontinuation instructions expressly preserve suspension and deposit requirements for covered entries on or before June 25. They provide no general refund of those deposits. Importers should retain the original entry dates, company assignments and instructions for that inventory. Traverse's analysis of solar CVD litigation and administrative reviews addresses the later assessment questions that remain separate from entry financing.
December adds another calculation to the same forecast
The August 6 polysilicon proclamation schedules the minimum-import-price program and derivative tariffs from December 4. Clause 5(a) makes those charges additional to other applicable duties. Its price-floor calculation depends on the product, entered value and required documentation, so adding 15 percentage points to the table is not a complete December estimate.
Bring those December rules into the same shipment forecast as a separate component. Keep the supplier match, consumption-entry or warehouse-withdrawal date, current CBP message and conditional AD/CVD amount together. The proclamation also permits restrictions on company stockpiling before its tariff start date, which makes accelerated imports a separate compliance decision.
The next revision to the forecast should follow the final Commerce notices and CBP instructions, then the ITC determination and its publication. Those records can change the applicable rate, scope or collection date. Until they arrive, the announced final sum belongs in the funding scenario, and the latest applicable entry instruction governs the cash due now.
From reading to review
Run the numbers on your lane.
The duty calculator runs the current stack for any HTS code and origin. A free account opens full tool output, AD/CVD detail, Chapter 98 processing, and available exports.